Sunday, December 21, 2014

BUY CTET BOOKS ONLINE

BUY CTET BOOKS ONLINE



CTETटीईटी / TET - Teacher Eligibility Test / CENTRAL TEACHER ELIGIBILITY TEST/ Updates / Teacher Recruitment News

IF YOU ARE PREPARING FOR CTET , AND SEARCHING STUDY MATERIAL / BOOKS FOR CTET EXMA THEN YOU CAN VISIT FLIPKART WEBSITE.
HERE YOU CAN SEE AROUND 400 BOOKS FOR CTET OLD PAPERS, MOCK TETS, SOLVED PAPERS, PRACTICE SET ETC. AT CHEAPER RATES.

SEE SOME MORE BOOKS (OTHER THAN PUBLISHED IN EARLIER POST) :-

































Saturday, December 20, 2014

CTET BOOKS BUY ONLINE

CTET KA FORM BHARNE VAALON KE LIYE BOOKS/ STUDY MATERIAL AVAILABLE ONLINE


CTET BOOKS BUY ONLINE

AGAR AAP CTET KA FORM BHAR RAHE HAIN, AUR IS SE SAMBANDHIT BOOKS/ STUDY MATERIAL KEE TALASH MEIN HAI, TO
AAP ONLINE E COMMERCE SITE PAR BHEE ISKA AVLOKAN KAR AKTW HAIN

FLIPKART AAJKAL 500 RS SE OOPAR KE ITEMS PAR FREE DELIVERY DE RAHA HAI,
KUCH ITEMS PAR VAISE HEE FREE DELIVERY HAI AGAR LOCAL SUPLIER MOJOOD HAI TO












































MOST RECOMMENDED BOOKS TO BUY ON FLIPKART, SNAPDEAL, AMAZON

MOST RECOMMENDED BOOKS TO BUY ON FLIPKART, SNAPDEAL, AMAZON


फ्लिपकार्ट पर यह तीनो बुक्स पैसा वसूल हैं , खासकर एनालिटिकल रीज़निंग वाली किताब ।

अगर आप प्रतियोगिता परीक्षाओं की तैयारी कर रहे हों , और आपके पास यह एनालिटिकल रीज़निंग वाली किताब नहीं है तो मेरा सुझाव है की जरूर खरीदें ।

आपका पूरा पैसा वसूल वाली गारंटीड  किताब है इसमें सीलोगिज़म , पारिवारिक सम्बन्धो और अन्य तरह की सभी रीज़निंग को बहुत ही बेहतरीन तरीके से बताये गया है

फ्लिपकार्ट आजकल 500 रूपए से ऊपर की खरीद पर ही ज्यादातर फ्री डिलीवरी दे रहा है , वैसे इन बुक्स पर आसानी से देगा , क्यूंकि इस बुक के डीलर हर जगह उपलब्ध हैं
डेलिवरी के लिए अपना पिन कोड दाल कर चेक कर लें

Analytical Reasoning (English) 3rd Edition

(Paperback)

Author: M. K. Pandey
Language: English
Length: 710 pages
Publisher: BSC Publishing
MRP: Rs. 250
Rs. 175 30% OFF
Selling Price
(Free delivery)
 FLIPKART LINK FOR Analytical Reasoning (English) 3rd Edition :  CLICK HERE

*******************

English is Easy: If you follow this book (English) 2nd Edition

(Paperback)
aperback
Author: Chetananand Singh
Language: English
Length: 764 pages
Publisher: Bsc Publishing House
MRP: Rs. 250
Rs. 185 26% OFF
Selling Price
(Free delivery)

FLIPKART LINK FOR ENGLISH IS EASY - CLICK HERE

*****************************

Magical Book On Quicker Maths (English) 3rd Edition

(Paperback)
Author: M. Tyra
Language: English
Length: 807 pages
Publisher: BSC Publishing
MRP: Rs. 330
Rs. 258 21% OFF
Selling Price
(Free delivery)

FLIPKART LINK FOR Magical Book On Quicker Maths -CLICK HERE

Monday, December 8, 2014

FLIPKART DISCOUNT OFFER- from 8th December to 12th December 2014


Best Vegeterian Recipes of India http://recipe-home.blogspot.com/ स्वाद का जयका इंडिया (रेसिप-होम.ब्लागस्पाट.कॉम )
Visit for Amazing ,Must Read Stories, Information, Funny Jokes - http://7joke.blogspot.com 7Joke
FLIPKART DISCOUNT OFFER- from 8th December to 12th December 2014
Click Herev


Bank Offers:

1) Flat 10% instant discount on ALL orders of Rs 3,000 or more using State Bank Debit Card(s), only on Flipkart Mobile Apps

2) Flat 10% instant discount on ALL orders of Rs 3,000 or more using SBI Credit Card(s), only on Flipkart Mobile Apps
10% instant discount is valid between 08th Dec, 2014 (00:00 hrs) till 12th Dec, 2014 (23:59 hrs)
Maximum discount per transaction will be Rs 750
Maximum numbers of transactions allowed per Card is 2
The Offer is applicable on purchases made from ALL Sellers on Flipkart
This Offer is NOT applicable on iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus
This Offer is NOT applicable on transactions/orders done on Flipkart's desktop & mobile websites
This offer will be applicable over & above all the other on-going deals listed below
BIG APP SHOPPING DAYS offers:

Below are some of the offers which will be live on Flipkart.com website as well as mobile apps (few offers available only on the Mobile Apps) till 12-December-2014 or till the inventory for these products lasts (whichever is earlier). A list of such offers across categories are listed below:-

Clothing & Footwear
Minimum 40% Off on Men's Clothing (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App)

Minimum 40% Off on Women's Clothing (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) -



Minimum 40% Off on Men's Footwear (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) -

Minimum 40% Off on Women's Footwear (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) -

Home Furnishings, Watches, Jewellery & Fashion Accessories
Minimum 40% Off on Bags, Wallets & Belts (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) -

Minimum 40% Off on Watches (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App).
Minimum 40% Off on Sunglasses (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) -.
Minimum 40% Off on Home Furnishings (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Minimum 40% Off on Fashion Jewellery (+ Extra 20% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Perfumes, Beauty & Personal Care
Minimum 40% Off on select Perfumes (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App).
Minimum 15% Off on select Trimmers (+ Extra 5% Off on the Mobile App) -.
Minimum 15% Off on select Beauty & Personal Care products (+ Extra 15% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Flat 15% Off on select Make up products only on the Mobile App -.
Small Home & Kitchen Appliances
Minimum 30% Off on Induction Cooktops (+ Extra Rs 200 Off on the Mobile App) - .
Minimum 20% Off on Irons (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App) -.
Household & Kitchen Needs
Upto 20% Off on Corelle & Diva Dinner sets (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Flat 23% Off on Prestige Pressure Cooker & Tawa (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Upto 60% Off on Home Decor & Homeware products like Lamps, Tealight Holders, Decorative Platters & Candles (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App) -.
Flat 45% Off on Polyset Containers (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Mobiles & Accessories
Flat Rs. 500 Off on Moto E phones only on the Mobile App - .
Extra Rs 100 Off on Mi Power Bank (10400 mAh) only on the Mobile App -.
Laptops & Tablets
Flat Rs 3,000 Off on Asus Fonepad 7 (8GB) tablets (+ Extra Rs 700 Off on the Mobile App) - .
Extra Rs 2,000 Off on HP A8 Laptop only on the Mobile App - .
Large Appliances
Extra 10% Off on select LED Televisions only on the Mobile App -.
Sports
Minimum 28% Off on Yonex Badminton Gear (+ Extra 5% Off on the Mobile App) - .
Books
Minimum 25% Off on select Fiction & Non-Fiction Books (+ Extra 10% Off on the Mobile App) - .




संसार की अद्भुत बातों , अच्छी कहानियों प्रेरक प्रसंगों व् मजेदार जोक्स के लिए क्लिक करें... http://7joke.blogspot.com

Tuesday, November 25, 2014

FLIPKART PAR COMPETITIVE BOOKS At Low Price , HIGHLY RECOMMENDED BOOKS BY ADMIN

Sarkari Naukri Damad India. Latest Upadted Indian Govt Jobs - http://sarkari-damad.blogspot.com
FLIPKART PAR COMPETITIVE BOOKS At Low Price , HIGHLY RECOMMENDED BOOKS BY ADMIN

THESE BOOKS ARE JUST LIKE ARJUN GANDEEV , AND VERY VERY HELPFUL FOR CANDIATES APPEARING IN COMPETITIVE EXAMS

YE VALUABLE BOOKS ( Ye HAMARE DWARA BHEE RECOMMENDED HAIN), COMPETITION KE LIYE BAHUT FAYDEMAND HAIN

BANKING SERVICE CHRONICLE KEE TIPS / TRICKS KE SAATH 3-4 POPULAR BOOKS HAIN, AUR BAHUT HEE BEHTREEN TRICKS DEEE HUEE HAIN

SABHEE EXAMS KE LIYE BAHUT HEE FAYDEMAND HAIN


AAP BANKING SERVICE CHRONICLE KEE 3 BOOKS COMBO MEIN KHAREEDEN TO AUR DISCOUNT HAI, AUR ISKEE TEENO BOOKS AAPKO BAHUT HEE BEHTREEN PRADARSHAN KARNE MEIN JABARDAST MOKA DENGEE.

ADMIN KEE VISESH PASAND HAI

KHUD BSC ( BANKING SERVICE CHRONICLE) APNEE COACHING ETC MEIN YAHEE TRICKS BATAATAE REHTE HAIN,, MAGAR IN BOOKS MEIN UNKEE COACHING KAA SAAR HAI


अगर आपने बैंकिंग सर्विस क्रॉनिकल की यह बुक्स नहीं पडी हैं, और प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं में शामिल हो रहे हैं
तो यह बुक्स आपको विशेष हेल्प करेंगी
यह सिर्फ बैंक में ही नहीं , सभी प्रतियोगी परीक्षाओं में आपको विशेष लाभ पहुंचा सकती हैं ।
फ्लिपकार्ट पेपर बेक क्वालिटी में यह बुक्स आकर्षक दाम  में दे रहा है

 अगर आपके पास कॉम्बो यानी तीनो  बुक्स नहीं है तो लेने की जरूर सोचें, एक साथ डिस्काउंट मिल जायेगा


***************************

ORIGINAL PRITING MEIN PAPER BACK MEIN YEH BOOKS AAKARSHAK DAAM MEIN MIL RAHEE HAIN

English is Easy: If you follow this book (English) 2nd Edition

(Paperback)
aperback
Author: Chetananand Singh
Language: English
Length: 764 pages
Publisher: Bsc Publishing House
1

FLIPKART LINK FOR ENGLISH IS EASY - CLICK HERE


*****************************

Magical Book On Quicker Maths (English) 3rd Edition

(Paperback)
Author: M. Tyra
Language: English
Length: 807 pages
Publisher: BSC Publishing





FLIPKART LINK FOR Magical Book On Quicker Maths -CLICK HERE

******************************

Analytical Reasoning (English) 3rd Edition

(Paperback)

Author: M. K. Pandey
Language: English
Length: 710 pages
Publisher: BSC Publishing

FLIPKART LINK FOR Analytical Reasoning (English) 3rd Edition :  CLICK HERE
****************************************





Published at http://sarkari-damad.blogspot.com (Click on the Labels below for more similar Jobs)

Saturday, November 22, 2014

Must Read, Must Read Story, Facebook

Visit for Amazing ,Must Read Stories, Information, Funny Jokes - http://7joke.blogspot.com 7Joke

Must Read, Must Read Story, Facebook











संसार की अद्भुत बातों , अच्छी कहानियों प्रेरक प्रसंगों व् मजेदार जोक्स के लिए क्लिक करें... http://7joke.blogspot.com

Saturday, May 18, 2013

Know Your Aadhaar Card Status Using - 3 Ways

Know Your Aadhaar Card Status Using - 3 Ways
तीन तरीके से जान सकते हैं आधार का स्‍टेटस


यदि आपको आधार (यूआईडी) का रजिस्‍ट्रेशन कराए हुए काफी समय हो गया है और आधार कार्ड आपके पास तक नहीं पहुंचा है तो इन तीन तरीकों से आधार का स्‍टेटस जान सकते हैं।


एसएमएस से

इसके लिए मोबाइल फोन के मैसेज बॉक्स में जाकर UID STATUS <14>टाइप करके  51969 नंबर पर भेजना होगा। यदि पंजीकृत मोबाइल से एसएमएस किया गया है तो इसके उत्तर में आने वाला एसएमएस दो तरह की जानकारी देगा। पहली यदि आपका आधार नंबर जारी कर दिया गया है तो इसे एसएमएस के जरिये आपको भेज दिया जाएगा। यदि आपका आधार नंबर जारी नहीं हुआ है तो उसकी वर्तमान स्थिति से आपको सूचित किया जाएगा।बिना पंजीकृत मोबाइलसे एसएमएस करने पर आपको सिर्फ वर्तमान स्थिति की जानकारी मिलेगी। 14 अंकों का ईआईडी : नामांकन संख्या ( /के बिना) है जो कि पंजीकरण पावती पर लिखी होती है।

ऑनलाइन
इसके लिए सबसे पहले https://portal.uidai.gov.in/ResidentPortal/statusLink लिंक पर जाना होगा। वहां पर 14 अंकों का ईआईडी और समय के 14 अंकों के जरिये स्‍टेटस जाना जा सकता है। यदि आपका आधार कार्ड बन गया होगा तो यहां पर उसकी जानकारी मिल जाएगी। इसके अलावा यदि कार्ड को आपके दिए हुए पते पर भेजा जा चुका है तो इसके बारे में भी आपको यहीं पर सूचना मिल जाएगी।

फोन से
फोन नंबर 18001801947 के जरिये फोन करके आधार नंबर के बारे में किसी भी प्रकार की जानकारी ली जा सकती है। इस नंबर के जरिये किसी भी भारतीय भाषा में बात की जा सकती है। यह हेल्‍पलाइन सुबह 10 बजे से रात 11 बजे तक काम करती है





Saturday, August 18, 2012

Hospitals empanelled under CGHS

Hospitals empanelled under CGHS


Latest List of CGHS Hospital 

Site : http://msotransparent.nic.in/writereaddata/cghsdata/mainlinkfile/File213.pdf
Hospitals empanelled under CGHS, DELHI
GENERAL PURPOSE HOSPITALS
S. No. / Name of the Hospital / Approved for Whether accredited by NABH /
Whether already on the panel of CGHS and if yes, facilities approved

Sunday, November 13, 2011

Retirement of an employee using Janmkundli by Government

पूर्व जन्म की कुंडली को देख कर दिया सेवानिवृत्त!

जबलपुर. मप्र राज्य कर्मचारी संघ के प्रतिनिधिमंडल द्वारा जारी कर्मचारी संपर्क अभियान के दौरान प्रतिनिधिमंडल ने साइंस कॉलेज पहुचकर कर्मचारियों की समस्याओं को जाना। अभियान के दौरान प्रतिनिधिमंडल ने पाया कि कॉलेज में पम्प अटेन्डेन्ट के पद पर कार्यरत रहे मनीराम यादव को चार माह पूर्व उनकी जन्म कुण्डली के आधार पर सेवानिवृत्त कर दिया गया।

संघ ने आरोप लगाते हुए कहा कि सेवानिवृत्त होने के बाद कॉलेज द्वारा उन्हें किसी प्रकार की मदद नहीं की गई। जब इस संबंध में प्राचार्य से बातचीत की गई तो उन्होंने कहा कि श्री यादव की सर्विस बुक व अन्य शासकीय अभिलेखों में न तो उनकी जन्म तिथि अंकित है,न ही नियुक्ति तिथि, इसलिए कुण्डली के आधार पर सेवानिवृत्त किया गया है।


News : http://www.bhaskar.com/article/MP-OTH-employee-superannuated-on-kundli-basis-2044688.html
*************

RTI - 2nd Apeal also through Video Conferencing

RTI के तहत वीडियो कांफ्रेंसिंग से भी दूसरी अपील की सुनवाई


पटना. बिहार में सूचना के अधिकार कानून (आरटीआयी) को और प्रभावशाली तथा आम लोगों के लिए सुविधाजनक बनाने के उद्देश्य से दूसरी अपील की सुनवाई वीडियो कांफ्रेंसिंग के जरिये करायी जायेगी। जिसके कारण अब आवेदकों को राज्य के अन्य हिस्सों से राजधानी पटना आने की जरुरत नहीं होगी।



मुख्य सूचना आयुक्त एके चौधरी ने आज यहां संवाददाता सम्मेलन में बताया कि वीडियो कांफ्रेंसिंग का उद्घाटन 28 जुलाई को मुख्यमंत्री नीतीश कुमार स्थानीय श्रीकृष्ण स्मारक भवन में करेंगे। उन्होंने बताया कि इस सुविधा के शुरु होने से अब आवेदकों को दूसरी अपील की सुनवाई के लिए अन्य जिलों से पटना नहीं आना होगा।
**************************************
जल्द शुरू होगी सूचना आयोग की वेबसाईट - 

श्री चौधरी ने बताया कि दूसरी अपील की सुनवाई के लिए हर जिले में एक वीडियो कांफ्रेंसिंग हाल होगा जो पटना में सूचना आयुक्त से सीधे जुड़ा होगा। जिसके कारण आवेदकों और लोक सूचना अधिकारी वहीँ से अपना पक्ष रख सकेंगे। इससे उनके समय और पैसे दोनों की बचत होगी। उन्होंने बताया कि सूचना आयोग की वेबसाईट भी जल्द शुरु होगी जिसमें सूचना आयोग के अब तक के सभी फैसले उपलब्ध होंगे।
News Source : http://bollywood2.bhaskar.com/article/BIH-the-second-appeal-hearing-by-video-conference-under-rti-2295619.html
----------------------------------------------

Monday, November 7, 2011

Indian Citizen can see any of Government Employee's ACR

Disclosure of Other Employee's ACR is permitted under RTI / CIC Decision



It is not confidential and right of Citizen's to ask any officer's / Government Servent / Public Employee


Citizens/ Employee of an organization can see other officer/employee's ACR (Annual Confidentail Report)

See Decision : http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SG_A_2011_002016_15380_M_69526.pdf
----------------------------------------------
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION


Club Building (Near Post Office)

Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067

Tel: +91-11-26161796

Decision No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002016/15380

Appeal No. CIC/SG/A/2011/002016

Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant : Dr. Ashok Kumar, Scientist D

Division of Genetics and Tree,

Propagation Forest Research Institute,

Dehradun - 248195

Respondent : Dr. Devendra Kumar,

Public Information Officer & Scientist,

Ministry of Environment and Forests.

Indian Council of Forestry Research and Education,

New Forest, Dehradun – 248006,

Uttarakhand

RTI application filed on : 12/05/2010

PIO replied on : 17/06/2011

First Appeal filed on : 10/06/2011

First Appellate Authority order of : 08/07/2011

Second Appeal received on : 23/07/2011

Information sought:

“Information regarding adverse remarks against appellant in APAR 2099-2011. A remark was made

that the appellant had ‘failed to control the unlawful involvement of PLO Dr. Paramjit Singh…’

1. Information pertaining to this incidence particularly on

i. Copy of information / complaint by and individual or group of individuals.

ii. Copy of the letter /l note sheet pertaining to composition of any enquiry committee.

iii. Copy of charge-sheets or other procedural steps undertaken as per governmental rules.

iv. Copy of FIR launched.

v. Copies of all other related letters / communication / note – sheets.

vi. Copy of the document issued by competent authorities on punishment to Dr. Pramjit Singh

2. Was an adverse entry made in ACR OF Head, Extension Division, FRI, Dehradun or any other

controlling officer to whom Dr. Sing was directly, reporting for not controlled his unlawful in

evolvement in womanizing at Scientist Hostel on 23.10.2009?

i. If yes supply the copy of ACR of the then HoD of Extension Division and other controlling

officer.

ii. If not, motive thereby for not making adverse entries an the ACR of controlling officers.

3. Was there any complaint(s) for such unlawful involvements in past also against PLO, if yes supply

copies of the same on,

i. Complaint (s) and action taken against PIO during that time.

ii. Proof of adverse entry was made in the ACR of the then Watch and Ward officers.

iii. Proof of adverse entry was made in the ACR of his controlling officers.

Page 1 of 4

4. Supply copy of rules that define/ indicate Watch and Ward Officer’s responsibility to (a) control

PLO and Wardens of Hostels and (b) check the activities carried out in rooms of Scientist Hostel

and guest house.

5. Supply copy of the complaints of sexual harassments received in headquarters of ICFRE and FP---

January 2005 onwards and the action taken on each complaint and their reflections in the ACRs/---

6. Kindly provide the copies of ACRs/ APARs for, following Scientists for the years 2007-08, 2008-09

and 2009-10.

i. Dr. H S Ginwal, Scientist E and Head, G&TP Division FRI, Dehradun.

ii. Dr. Santan Barthwal, Scientist, G&TP Division FRI Dehradun.

iii. Ms Parveen, Scientist, G&TP Division FRI Dehardun.

iv. Dr. Rajiv Pandey, FRI/ ICPRE, Dehradun (Watch and Ward Officer upto Oct.2008.

v. Dr. Ajay Thakur, Scientist Botany Division FRI Dehradun (attended XII WFC, Argentina).

vi. Dr. Madhumita Ghosh, Scientist, IPGTB, Coimbatore (attended XII WFC, Argentina).

vii. Dr. B N Diwakar, Scientists, IFP, Ranchi ( aattended XII WFC, A rgentina)”

Reply of Public Information Officer (PIO):

“Information means any material in any form including records documents, memo, e-mails, opinions,

advices, press releases, circulars, orders, logbooks, contract reports, papers, samples, models, data

material held in any electronic form and information relating to any private body which can be

accessed by a public authority under any other law fork the time being in force.

Most of the points on which clarification has been sought are not covered as information under

the Act. As you are working as Scientist ‘D’ in the FRI Dehradun where a public Information officer

( Establishment Watch & Ward and other Administrative matters) is functioning you have to apply to

him for furnishing information on the points related to watch & ward matters. However, our application

is being transferred to the concerned PIO under Sec. 6(3) of the Act for furnishing relevant information

fi any on SL. No. 1,3,4 & 5 of your application. Clarification sought in SL. No. 2 of the application

cannot be termed as information. Hence is not covered under the Act As regard SL. No 6 asking for

copies of ACRs/APARs of some other officers that cannot he supplied being the 3rd party information in

terms of the provision under Sec. 8(j) of the RTI Act 2005.”

Grounds for First Appeal:

The appellant was received an unsatisfactory reply from the PIO.

Order of First Appellate Authority (FAA):

“In this connection it is to inform that the (PIO, ICFRE (hqrs.). Dehradun has already served a reply to

you vide letter dated 17th June 2011. A Copy of the same is enclosed herewith again for ready reference.

The observations made by the CPIO, ICFRE is as per the provisions of RTI Act.”

Grounds for Second Appeal:

Dissatisfied with information provided and order of FAA.

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:

The following were present:

Appellant: Mr. Ashok Kumar;

Respondent: Dr. Devendra Kumar, PIO & Scientist via video conference from NIC Studio- Dehradun.

The PIO states that he took over as PIO on September 2011 and has sent information on queries 1 and 5

on 24/10/2011 and 28/10/2011 respectively, which has been received by the Appellant. The PIO has not

provided information on queries 2 and 3 without any adequate reason and claims that he has provided

information on query 4. The Appellant claims that he has not received information on query 4. As

Page 2 of 4

regards query 6, the PIO claims that information about the ACRs/ APARs of other officers cannot be

provided as this is exempt under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act.

Under Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act, information which has been exempted is defined as:

“information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship

to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of

the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information

Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest

justifies the disclosure of such information: …”

To qualify for the exemption under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, the information must satisfy the

following criteria:

1. It must be personal information: Words in a law should normally be given the meaning given in

common language. In common language, we would ascribe the adjective 'personal' to an attribute

which applies to an individual and not to an institution or a Corporate. Therefore, it flows that

'personal' cannot be related to institutions, organisations or corporates. Hence Section 8(1)(j) of the

RTI Act cannot be applied when the information concerns institutions, organisations or corporates.

2. The phrase 'disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest' means that

the information must have been given in the course of a public activity. Various public authorities in

performing their functions routinely ask for 'personal' information from citizens, and this is clearly a

public activity. Public activities would typically include situations wherein a person applies for a job,

or gives information about himself to a public authority as an employee, or asks for a permission,

licence or authorisation, or provides information in discharge of a statutory obligation.

3. The disclosure of the information would lead to unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the

individual. The State has no right to invade the privacy of an individual. There are some

extraordinary situations where the State may be allowed to invade the privacy of a citizen. In those

circumstances special provisions of the law apply usually with certain safeguards. Therefore where

the State routinely obtains information from citizens, this information is in relationship to a public

activity and will not be an intrusion on privacy.

Certain human rights such as liberty, freedom of expression or right to life are universal and therefore

would apply uniformly to all human beings worldwide. However, the concept of 'privacy' is a cultural

notion, related to social norms, and different societies would look at these differently. Therefore

referring to the Data Protection Act, 1988 of U. K. or the laws of other countries to define ‘privacy’

cannot be considered a valid exercise to constrain the citizen’s fundamental right to information in India.

Parliament has not codified the right to privacy so far, hence, in balancing the right to information of

citizens and the individual's right to privacy, the citizen's right to information would be given greater

weightage.

In the instant case, there is no doubt that the information sought is “personal” information inasmuch as it

is the Annual Confidential Report of a government officer. The ACR is a report that evaluates the work

and performance of a public servant. The public authority concerned, must necessarily have this

information so to make an assessment of its officers’ performance. The ACR, containing certain

information about the officer is disclosed by the officer to the public authority and such report is

prepared by the public authority. This is necessarily done in the course of a public activity. Disclosure of

such information cannot be construed as unwarranted invasion of privacy of the officer concerned as it

concerns issues raised in the exercise of his public activity as a public servant. Moreover, a public

Page 3 of 4

servant is accountable to the public and therefore, every citizen has the right to obtain information that

may assess his credibility, integrity and performance.

It is pertinent to mention that the Supreme Court of India in Union of India v. ADR in Appeal (Civil) 178

of 2001 and W. P. (Civil) 294 of 2001 decided on 02/05/2002, observed that persons who aspire to be

public servants by getting elected have to declare inter alia their property details, any conviction/

acquittal of criminal charges, etc. It follows that persons who are already public servants cannot claim

exemptions from disclosure of charges against them or details of their assets. Given our dismal record of

misgovernance and rampant corruption which colludes to deny citizens’ their essential rights and

dignity, it is imperative for achieving the goal of democracy that the citizens’ right to information is

given greater primacy with regard to privacy.

Therefore, disclosure of information such as property details, any conviction/ acquittal of criminal

charges, etc of a public servant, which is routinely collected by the public authority and provided by the

public servants, cannot be construed as an invasion of the privacy of an individual and must be provided

an applicant under the RTI Act. Similarly, citizens have a right to know about the strengths and

weaknesses as well as performance evaluation of all public servants. The government is elected by the

citizens of India and it is the duty of such government through its officers to protect the rights of the

citizens. The salary of such government officers is also paid from the public exchequer. For these

reasons, every citizen has the right to know and obtain information about the performance of every

public servant or government officer to ascertain whether the duties entrusted to such public servant or

government officer are being carried out.

It would not be out of place to mention that the terminology “Annual Confidential Report” has been

used since the British times when ‘secrecy’ was the guiding notion for the government and

consequently, the work done by the latter was not for the citizens’ perusal and kept confidential. This

was evidenced by the enactment of the Official Secrets Act, 1923. Over the years, this trend has

undergone a drastic change inasmuch as the Indian judiciary recognised the citizen’s right to have access

to information under the control of government entities in order to bring about transparency and

accountability in the functioning of every government department. This was given a statutory ratification

by way of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which recognised the citizen’s fundamental right to

information. The RTI Act endeavours to do away with the notion of ‘secrecy’ which was prevalent in

the British era and carried forwarded thereafter inasmuch as Section 22 of the RTI Act specifically

provides that the RTI Act shall override the Official Secrets Act, 1923 irrespective of any inconsistency

contained in the latter. In view of the foregoing arguments this Commission holds that performance

appraisals,- known as annual confidential reports since the days of British Raj,- are not covered by

Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act and disclosure of these cannot be construed as invasion on the privacy of

an individual.

Decision:

The Appeal is allowed. The PIO is directed to provide the information on queries 2, 3, 4 and 6 to the

Appellant before 20 November 2011.

This decision is announced in open chamber.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.

Shailesh Gandhi

Information Commissioner

31 October 2011

(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number.)(SU)

Page 4 of 4
 

 

Indian Citizen can see any of Government Employee's ACR

Disclosure of Other Employee's ACR is permitted under RTI / CIC Decision


It is not confidential and right of Citizen's to ask any officer's / Government Servent / Public Employee

Citizens/ Employee of an organization can see other officer/employee's ACR (Annual Confidentail Report)

See Link : http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_SM_A_2011_000713_SG_14793_M_67163.pdf
----------------------------------------------------------------------
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION


Club Building (Near Post Office)

Old JNU Campus, New Delhi - 110067

Tel: +91-11-26161796

Decision No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000713/SG/14793

Appeal No. CIC/SM/A/2011/000713/SG

Relevant facts emerging from the Appeal:

Appellant : Mr. Keshav Gupta

25 A Vivek Vihar

New Sangner Road

Jiapur-302019 (Rajasthan)

Respondent : Mr. Ashok Sharma

PIO & Chief Manager

Oriental Bank of Commerce,

1st Floor, 173-174 G-Block

Sri Ganganagar 335001

RTI application filed on : 25/10/2010

PIO replied on : 12/11/2010

First Appeal : 10/12/2010

First Appellate Authority order on : Not Enclosed

Second Appeal received on : 11/02/2011

Information Sought:

1. Sh. Rakesh Gupta, Manager, Oriental Bank Of Commerce, sent evaluation form of 3 years, with

comments of the reporting manager.

2. Letters sent to the head office along with the recommendations and details of the letters for 3 years.

3. In the loan year, how many officers were classified on the following categories in your State:

(a) Good (b) Very Good

(c) Average (d) Above Average

(e) Provide particulars of the above details.

Reply:

Declined to give information by grounds of S 8(1)(j).

Grounds for the First Appeal/ Complaint:

No information provided by the PIO.

Order of the First Appellate Authority (FAA):

Exemption under 8(1) of RTI, 2005.

Ground of the Second Appeal:

Not satisfied with the response of the first authority as information not provided under section 8(1) of

RTI,2005..

Relevant Facts emerging during Hearing:

The following were present:

Appellant: Mr. Keshav Gupta on video conference from NIC-Jaipur Studio;

Respondent: Mr. Ashok Sharma, PIO & Chief Manager on video conference from NIC-Ganganagar;

The respondent states that the information has not been provided by the then PIO in the belief

that the information was exempt however the PIO has realizes his mistake and sent the information to

the Appellant 21/09/2011 by receipt no. Z43724792. The PIO has sent the ACR of the Appellant but

has not sent the ACRs of the other officers which were demanded by him claiming exemption under

Page 1 of 3

Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. This Commission has ruled in its decision

no.CIC/SG/A/2011/000464/12432 of 18 May 2011

Under Section 8 (1) (j) of the RTI Act, information which has been exempted is defined as:

“information which relates to personal information the disclosure of which has no relationship

to any public activity or interest, or which would cause unwarranted invasion of the privacy of

the individual unless the Central Public Information Officer or the State Public Information

Officer or the appellate authority, as the case may be, is satisfied that the larger public interest

justifies the disclosure of such information: …”

To qualify for the exemption under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act, the information must satisfy the

following criteria:

1. It must be personal information: Words in a law should normally be given the meaning given

in common language. In common language, we would ascribe the adjective 'personal' to an

attribute which applies to an individual and not to an institution or a Corporate. Therefore, it flows

that 'personal' cannot be related to institutions, organisations or corporates. Hence Section 8(1)(j)

of the RTI Act cannot be applied when the information concerns institutions, organisations or

corporates.

2. The phrase 'disclosure of which has no relationship to any public activity or interest' means that

the information must have been given in the course of a public activity. Various public authorities

in performing their functions routinely ask for 'personal' information from citizens, and this is

clearly a public activity. Public activities would typically include situations wherein a person

applies for a job, or gives information about himself to a public authority as an employee, or asks

for a permission, licence or authorisation, or provides information in discharge of a statutory

obligation.

3. The disclosure of the information would lead to unwarranted invasion of the privacy of the

individual. The State has no right to invade the privacy of an individual. There are some

extraordinary situations where the State may be allowed to invade the privacy of a citizen. In those

circumstances special provisions of the law apply usually with certain safeguards. Therefore where

the State routinely obtains information from citizens, this information is in relationship to a public

activity and will not be an intrusion on privacy.

Certain human rights such as liberty, freedom of expression or right to life are universal and therefore

would apply uniformly to all human beings worldwide. However, the concept of 'privacy' is a cultural

notion, related to social norms, and different societies would look at these differently. Therefore

referring to the Data Protection Act, 1988 of U. K. or the laws of other countries to define ‘privacy’

cannot be considered a valid exercise to constrain the citizen’s fundamental right to information in

India. Parliament has not codified the right to privacy so far, hence, in balancing the right to

information of citizens and the individual's right to privacy, the citizen's right to information would be

given greater weightage.

In the instant case, there is no doubt that the information sought is “personal” information inasmuch as

it is the Annual Confidential Report of a government officer. The ACR is a report that evaluates the

work and performance of a public servant. The public authority concerned, must necessarily have this

information so to make an assessment of its officers’ performance. The ACR, containing certain

information about the officer is disclosed by the officer to the public authority and such report is

prepared by the public authority. This is necessarily done in the course of a public activity. Disclosure

of such information cannot be construed as unwarranted invasion of privacy of the officer concerned

as it concerns issues raised in the exercise of his public activity as a public servant. Moreover, a public

servant is accountable to the public and therefore, every citizen has the right to obtain information that

may assess his credibility, integrity and performance.

Page 2 of 3

It is pertinent to mention that the Supreme Court of India in Union of India v. ADR in Appeal (Civil)

178 of 2001 and W. P. (Civil) 294 of 2001 decided on 02/05/2002, observed that persons who aspire to

be public servants by getting elected have to declare inter alia their property details, any conviction/

acquittal of criminal charges, etc. It follows that persons who are already public servants cannot claim

exemptions from disclosure of charges against them or details of their assets. Given our dismal record

of misgovernance and rampant corruption which colludes to deny citizens’ their essential rights and

dignity, it is imperative for achieving the goal of democracy that the citizens’ right to information is

given greater primacy with regard to privacy.

Therefore, disclosure of information such as property details, any conviction/ acquittal of criminal

charges, etc of a public servant, which is routinely collected by the public authority and provided by

the public servants, cannot be construed as an invasion of the privacy of an individual and must be

provided an applicant under the RTI Act. Similarly, citizens have a right to know about the strengths

and weaknesses as well as performance evaluation of all public servants. The government is elected by

the citizens of India and it is the duty of such government through its officers to protect the rights of

the citizens. The salary of such government officers is also paid from the public exchequer. For these

reasons, every citizen has the right to know and obtain information about the performance of every

public servant or government officer to ascertain whether the duties entrusted to such public servant or

government officer are being carried out.

It would not be out of place to mention that the terminology “Annual Confidential Report” has been

used since the British times when ‘secrecy’ was the guiding notion for the government and

consequently, the work done by the latter was not for the citizens’ perusal and kept confidential. This

was evidenced by the enactment of the Official Secrets Act, 1923. Over the years, this trend has

undergone a drastic change inasmuch as the Indian judiciary recognised the citizen’s right to have

access to information under the control of government entities in order to bring about transparency and

accountability in the functioning of every government department. This was given a statutory

ratification by way of the Right to Information Act, 2005, which recognised the citizen’s fundamental

right to information. The RTI Act endeavours to do away with the notion of ‘secrecy’ which was

prevalent in the British era and carried forwarded thereafter inasmuch as Section 22 of the RTI Act

specifically provides that the RTI Act shall override the Official Secrets Act, 1923 irrespective of any

inconsistency contained in the latter.

In view of the foregoing arguments this Commission holds that performance appraisals,- known as

annual confidential reports since the days of British Raj,- are not covered by Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI

Act and disclosure of these cannot be construed as invasion on the privacy of an individual.

Decision:

The Appeal is allowed.

The PIO is directed to provide the ACRs of all the officers demanded by the

Appellant before 25 October 2011.

This decision is announced in open chamber.

Notice of this decision be given free of cost to the parties.

Any information in compliance with this Order will be provided free of cost as per Section 7(6) of RTI Act.

Shailesh Gandhi

Information Commissioner

22 September 2011

(In any correspondence on this decision, mention the complete decision number. (BK))

Page 3 of 3